Export limit exceeded: 235609 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 235609 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (7307 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2025-54338 | 1 Desktopalert | 2 Pingalert, Pingalert Application Server | 2025-12-05 | 7.5 High |
| An Incorrect Access Control vulnerability was found in the Application Server of Desktop Alert PingAlert version 6.1.0.11 to 6.1.1.2 which allows an attacker to disclose user hashes. | ||||
| CVE-2025-54563 | 1 Desktopalert | 2 Pingalert, Pingalert Application Server | 2025-12-05 | 7.5 High |
| An Incorrect Access Control vulnerability was found in the Application Server of Desktop Alert PingAlert version 6.1.0.11 to 6.1.1.2 which allows Incorrect Access Control, leading to Remote Information Disclosure. | ||||
| CVE-2025-55471 | 1 Youlai | 1 Youlai-boot | 2025-12-05 | 7.5 High |
| Incorrect access control in the getUserFormData function of youlai-boot v2.21.1 allows attackers to access sensitive information for other users. | ||||
| CVE-2025-62509 | 1 Filerise | 2 Filerise, Filrise | 2025-12-04 | 8.1 High |
| FileRise is a self-hosted web-based file manager with multi-file upload, editing, and batch operations. Prior to version 1.4.0, a business logic flaw in FileRise’s file/folder handling allows low-privilege users to perform unauthorized operations (view/delete/modify) on files created by other users. The root cause was inferring ownership/visibility from folder names (e.g., a folder named after a username) and missing server-side authorization/ownership checks across file operation endpoints. This amounted to an IDOR pattern: an attacker could operate on resources identified only by predictable names. This issue has been patched in version 1.4.0 and further hardened in version 1.5.0. A workaround for this issue involves restricting non-admin users to read-only or disable delete/rename APIs server-side, avoid creating top-level folders named after other usernames, and adding server-side checks that verify ownership before delete/rename/move. | ||||
| CVE-2025-62510 | 1 Filerise | 1 Filerise | 2025-12-04 | 8.1 High |
| FileRise is a self-hosted web-based file manager with multi-file upload, editing, and batch operations. In version 1.4.0, a regression allowed folder visibility/ownership to be inferred from folder names. Low-privilege users could see or interact with folders matching their username and, in some cases, other users’ content. This issue has been patched in version 1.5.0, where it introduces explicit per-folder ACLs (owners/read/write/share/read_own) and strict server-side checks across list, read, write, share, rename, copy/move, zip, and WebDAV paths. | ||||
| CVE-2018-16152 | 3 Canonical, Debian, Strongswan | 3 Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux, Strongswan | 2025-12-03 | 7.5 High |
| In verify_emsa_pkcs1_signature() in gmp_rsa_public_key.c in the gmp plugin in strongSwan 4.x and 5.x before 5.7.0, the RSA implementation based on GMP does not reject excess data in the digestAlgorithm.parameters field during PKCS#1 v1.5 signature verification. Consequently, a remote attacker can forge signatures when small public exponents are being used, which could lead to impersonation when only an RSA signature is used for IKEv2 authentication. This is a variant of CVE-2006-4790 and CVE-2014-1568. | ||||
| CVE-2018-16151 | 3 Canonical, Debian, Strongswan | 3 Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux, Strongswan | 2025-12-03 | 7.5 High |
| In verify_emsa_pkcs1_signature() in gmp_rsa_public_key.c in the gmp plugin in strongSwan 4.x and 5.x before 5.7.0, the RSA implementation based on GMP does not reject excess data after the encoded algorithm OID during PKCS#1 v1.5 signature verification. Similar to the flaw in the same version of strongSwan regarding digestAlgorithm.parameters, a remote attacker can forge signatures when small public exponents are being used, which could lead to impersonation when only an RSA signature is used for IKEv2 authentication. | ||||
| CVE-2025-59305 | 1 Langfuse | 1 Langfuse | 2025-12-02 | 7.6 High |
| Improper authorization in the background migration endpoints of Langfuse 3.1 before d67b317 allows any authenticated user to invoke migration control functions. This can lead to data corruption or denial of service through unauthorized access to TRPC endpoints such as backgroundMigrations.all, backgroundMigrations.status, and backgroundMigrations.retry. | ||||
| CVE-2025-64066 | 1 Primakon | 2 Pi Portal, Project Contract Management | 2025-12-01 | 8.6 High |
| Primakon Pi Portal 1.0.18 REST /api/v2/user/register endpoint suffers from a Broken Access Control vulnerability. The endpoint fails to implement any authorization checks, allowing unauthenticated attackers to perform POST requests to register new user accounts in the application's local database. This bypasses the intended security architecture, which relies on an external Identity Provider for initial user registration and assumes that internal user creation is an administrative-only function. This vector can also be chained with other vulnerabilities for privilege escalation and complete compromise of application. This specific request can be used to also enumerate already registered user accounts, aiding in social engineering or further targeted attacks. | ||||
| CVE-2025-64062 | 1 Primakon | 2 Pi Portal, Project Contract Management | 2025-12-01 | 8.8 High |
| The Primakon Pi Portal 1.0.18 /api/V2/pp_users?email endpoint is used for user data filtering but lacks proper server-side validation against the authenticated session. By manipulating the email parameter to an arbitrary value (e.g., otheruser@user.com), an attacker can assume the session and gain full access to the target user's data and privileges. Also, if the email parameter is left blank, the application defaults to the first user in the list, who is typically the application administrator, resulting in an immediate Privilege Escalation to the highest level. | ||||
| CVE-2024-23681 | 1 Ls1intum | 1 Artemis Java Test Sandbox | 2025-11-28 | 8.2 High |
| Artemis Java Test Sandbox versions before 1.11.2 are vulnerable to a sandbox escape when an attacker loads untrusted libraries using System.load or System.loadLibrary. An attacker can abuse this issue to execute arbitrary Java when a victim executes the supposedly sandboxed code. | ||||
| CVE-2025-27062 | 1 Qualcomm | 307 315 5g Iot Modem, 315 5g Iot Modem Firmware, Apq8064au and 304 more | 2025-11-28 | 7.8 High |
| Memory corruption while handling client exceptions, allowing unauthorized channel access. | ||||
| CVE-2025-60799 | 2 Phppgadmin, Phppgadmin Project | 2 Phppgadmin, Phppgadmin | 2025-11-25 | 6.1 Medium |
| phpPgAdmin 7.13.0 and earlier contains an incorrect access control vulnerability in sql.php at lines 68-76. The application allows unauthorized manipulation of session variables by accepting user-controlled parameters ('subject', 'server', 'database', 'queryid') without proper validation or access control checks. Attackers can exploit this to store arbitrary SQL queries in $_SESSION['sqlquery'] by manipulating these parameters, potentially leading to session poisoning, stored cross-site scripting, or unauthorized access to sensitive session data. | ||||
| CVE-2021-3297 | 1 Zyxel | 2 Nbg2105, Nbg2105 Firmware | 2025-11-25 | 7.8 High |
| On Zyxel NBG2105 V1.00(AAGU.2)C0 devices, setting the login cookie to 1 provides administrator access. | ||||
| CVE-2019-11753 | 2 Microsoft, Mozilla | 3 Windows, Firefox, Firefox Esr | 2025-11-25 | 7.8 High |
| The Firefox installer allows Firefox to be installed to a custom user writable location, leaving it unprotected from manipulation by unprivileged users or malware. If the Mozilla Maintenance Service is manipulated to update this unprotected location and the updated maintenance service in the unprotected location has been altered, the altered maintenance service can run with elevated privileges during the update process due to a lack of integrity checks. This allows for privilege escalation if the executable has been replaced locally. <br>*Note: This attack requires local system access and only affects Windows. Other operating systems are not affected.*. This vulnerability affects Firefox < 69, Firefox ESR < 60.9, and Firefox ESR < 68.1. | ||||
| CVE-2019-11733 | 2 Mozilla, Redhat | 2 Firefox, Enterprise Linux | 2025-11-25 | 9.8 Critical |
| When a master password is set, it is required to be entered again before stored passwords can be accessed in the 'Saved Logins' dialog. It was found that locally stored passwords can be copied to the clipboard thorough the 'copy password' context menu item without re-entering the master password if the master password had been previously entered in the same session, allowing for potential theft of stored passwords. This vulnerability affects Firefox < 68.0.2 and Firefox ESR < 68.0.2. | ||||
| CVE-2016-9905 | 3 Debian, Mozilla, Redhat | 7 Debian Linux, Firefox, Thunderbird and 4 more | 2025-11-25 | N/A |
| A potentially exploitable crash in "EnumerateSubDocuments" while adding or removing sub-documents. This vulnerability affects Firefox ESR < 45.6 and Thunderbird < 45.6. | ||||
| CVE-2018-18505 | 4 Canonical, Debian, Mozilla and 1 more | 11 Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux, Firefox and 8 more | 2025-11-25 | N/A |
| An earlier fix for an Inter-process Communication (IPC) vulnerability, CVE-2011-3079, added authentication to communication between IPC endpoints and server parents during IPC process creation. This authentication is insufficient for channels created after the IPC process is started, leading to the authentication not being correctly applied to later channels. This could allow for a sandbox escape through IPC channels due to lack of message validation in the listener process. This vulnerability affects Thunderbird < 60.5, Firefox ESR < 60.5, and Firefox < 65. | ||||
| CVE-2025-9804 | 1 Wso2 | 17 Api Control Plane, Api Manager, Api Manager Analytics and 14 more | 2025-11-21 | 8.9 High |
| An improper access control vulnerability exists in multiple WSO2 products due to insufficient permission enforcement in certain internal SOAP Admin Services and System REST APIs. A low-privileged user may exploit this flaw to perform unauthorized operations, including accessing server-level information. This vulnerability affects only internal administrative interfaces. APIs exposed through the WSO2 API Manager's API Gateway remain unaffected. | ||||
| CVE-2025-54561 | 1 Desktopalert | 2 Pingalert, Pingalert Application Server | 2025-11-20 | 4.3 Medium |
| An Incorrect Access Control vulnerability was found in the Application Server of Desktop Alert PingAlert version 6.1.0.11 to 6.1.1.2 which allows remote access to content despite lack of the correct permission through a Broken Authorization Schema. | ||||