Export limit exceeded: 12857 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (12857 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2009-5153 | 1 Microfocus | 1 Netware | 2024-11-21 | N/A |
| In Novell NetWare before 6.5 SP8, a stack buffer overflow in processing of CALLIT RPC calls in the NFS Portmapper daemon in PKERNEL.NLM allowed remote unauthenticated attackers to execute code, because a length field was incorrectly trusted. | ||||
| CVE-2009-4267 | 1 Apache | 1 Juddi | 2024-11-21 | N/A |
| The console in Apache jUDDI 3.0.0 does not properly escape line feeds, which allows remote authenticated users to spoof log entries via the numRows parameter. | ||||
| CVE-2008-3278 | 1 Redhat | 2 Enterprise Linux, Frysk | 2024-11-21 | 7.8 High |
| frysk packages through 2008-08-05 as shipped in Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 are built with an insecure RPATH set in the ELF header of multiple binaries in /usr/bin/f* (e.g. fcore, fcatch, fstack, fstep, ...) shipped in the package. A local attacker can exploit this vulnerability by running arbitrary code as another user. | ||||
| CVE-2007-6762 | 1 Linux | 1 Linux Kernel | 2024-11-21 | N/A |
| In the Linux kernel before 2.6.20, there is an off-by-one bug in net/netlabel/netlabel_cipso_v4.c where it is possible to overflow the doi_def->tags[] array. | ||||
| CVE-2005-3590 | 1 Gnu | 1 Glibc | 2024-11-21 | N/A |
| The getgrouplist function in the GNU C library (glibc) before version 2.3.5, when invoked with a zero argument, writes to the passed pointer even if the specified array size is zero, leading to a buffer overflow and potentially allowing attackers to corrupt memory. | ||||
| CVE-2007-6442 | 2024-09-17 | N/A | ||
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-6114. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2007-6114. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-6114 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | ||||
| CVE-2007-6448 | 2024-09-16 | N/A | ||
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-6120. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2007-6120. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-6120 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | ||||
| CVE-2007-6447 | 2024-09-16 | N/A | ||
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-6114. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2007-6114. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-6114 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | ||||
| CVE-2007-6443 | 2024-09-16 | N/A | ||
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-6115. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2007-6115. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-6115 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | ||||
| CVE-2007-6440 | 2024-09-16 | N/A | ||
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-6112. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2007-6112. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-6112 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | ||||
| CVE-2024-8389 | 1 Mozilla | 1 Firefox | 2024-09-06 | 9.8 Critical |
| Memory safety bugs present in Firefox 129. Some of these bugs showed evidence of memory corruption and we presume that with enough effort some of these could have been exploited to run arbitrary code. This vulnerability affects Firefox < 130. | ||||
| CVE-2019-15290 | 2023-11-07 | N/A | ||
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2019-15098. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2019-15098. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2019-15098 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | ||||
| CVE-2019-10124 | 2023-11-07 | N/A | ||
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none | ||||
| CVE-2017-11735 | 2023-11-07 | N/A | ||
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue in the originally named product. Notes: none | ||||
| CVE-2016-1000025 | 2023-11-07 | N/A | ||
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2016-10542. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2016-10542. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2016-10542 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | ||||
| CVE-2007-6370 | 2023-11-07 | N/A | ||
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-5583. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2007-5583. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-5583 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | ||||
| CVE-2007-3004 | 1 Redhat | 1 Enterprise Linux | 2023-11-07 | N/A |
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-2788. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2007-2788. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-2788 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | ||||