Export limit exceeded: 200096 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 12016 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (12016 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2010-0749 | 3 Debian, Linux, Transmissionbt | 3 Debian Linux, Linux Kernel, Transmission | 2024-11-21 | 5.3 Medium |
| Transmission before 1.92 allows attackers to prevent download of a file by corrupted data during the endgame. | ||||
| CVE-2010-0109 | 1 Symantec | 1 Altiris Deployment Solution | 2024-11-21 | N/A |
| DBManager in Symantec Altiris Deployment Solution 6.9.x before DS 6.9 SP4 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via a crafted request. | ||||
| CVE-2009-5153 | 1 Microfocus | 1 Netware | 2024-11-21 | N/A |
| In Novell NetWare before 6.5 SP8, a stack buffer overflow in processing of CALLIT RPC calls in the NFS Portmapper daemon in PKERNEL.NLM allowed remote unauthenticated attackers to execute code, because a length field was incorrectly trusted. | ||||
| CVE-2007-6762 | 1 Linux | 1 Linux Kernel | 2024-11-21 | N/A |
| In the Linux kernel before 2.6.20, there is an off-by-one bug in net/netlabel/netlabel_cipso_v4.c where it is possible to overflow the doi_def->tags[] array. | ||||
| CVE-2005-3590 | 1 Gnu | 1 Glibc | 2024-11-21 | N/A |
| The getgrouplist function in the GNU C library (glibc) before version 2.3.5, when invoked with a zero argument, writes to the passed pointer even if the specified array size is zero, leading to a buffer overflow and potentially allowing attackers to corrupt memory. | ||||
| CVE-2007-6442 | 2024-09-17 | N/A | ||
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-6114. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2007-6114. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-6114 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | ||||
| CVE-2007-6448 | 2024-09-16 | N/A | ||
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-6120. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2007-6120. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-6120 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | ||||
| CVE-2007-6447 | 2024-09-16 | N/A | ||
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-6114. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2007-6114. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-6114 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | ||||
| CVE-2007-6443 | 2024-09-16 | N/A | ||
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-6115. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2007-6115. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-6115 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | ||||
| CVE-2007-6440 | 2024-09-16 | N/A | ||
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-6112. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2007-6112. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-6112 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | ||||
| CVE-2019-15290 | 2023-11-07 | N/A | ||
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2019-15098. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2019-15098. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2019-15098 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | ||||
| CVE-2019-10124 | 2023-11-07 | N/A | ||
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none | ||||
| CVE-2017-11735 | 2023-11-07 | N/A | ||
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue in the originally named product. Notes: none | ||||
| CVE-2016-1000025 | 2023-11-07 | N/A | ||
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2016-10542. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2016-10542. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2016-10542 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | ||||
| CVE-2007-6370 | 2023-11-07 | N/A | ||
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-5583. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2007-5583. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-5583 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | ||||
| CVE-2007-3004 | 1 Redhat | 1 Enterprise Linux | 2023-11-07 | N/A |
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-2788. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2007-2788. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-2788 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | ||||