Export limit exceeded: 235583 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 235583 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 235583 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 235583 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (235583 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-126166 | 1 Fortinet | 1 Fortimail | 2026-11-13 | 7.2 High |
| A improper neutralization of argument delimiters in a command ('argument injection') vulnerability in Fortinet FortiMail 8.0.0 through 8.0.2, FortiMail 7.6.0 through 7.6.6, FortiMail 7.4.0 through 7.4.8, FortiMail 7.2 all versions may allow an authenticated remote attacker with domain admin or admin privileges to delete users of other tenant domains on a paired FortiAuthenticator, execute arbitrary code as root or arbitrary CLI commands, and read or write arbitrary files as root via crafted HTTP requests to the administrative interface. | ||||
| CVE-2026-126169 | 1 Fortinet | 1 Fortimail | 2026-11-13 | 7.2 High |
| A improper neutralization of argument delimiters in a command ('argument injection') vulnerability in Fortinet FortiMail 8.0.0 through 8.0.2, FortiMail 7.6.0 through 7.6.6, FortiMail 7.4.0 through 7.4.8, FortiMail 7.2 all versions may allow an authenticated remote attacker with domain admin or admin privileges to delete users of other tenant domains on a paired FortiAuthenticator, execute arbitrary code as root or arbitrary CLI commands, and read or write arbitrary files as root via crafted HTTP requests to the administrative interface. | ||||
| CVE-2026-126179 | 1 Fortinet | 4 Fortianalyzer, Fortianalyzercloud, Fortimanager and 1 more | 2026-11-13 | 7.2 High |
| A improper neutralization of special elements used in an os command ('os command injection') vulnerability in Fortinet FortiAnalyzer 8.0.0, FortiAnalyzer 7.6.0 through 7.6.7, FortiAnalyzer 7.4.0 through 7.4.11, FortiAnalyzer 7.2.0 through 7.2.12, FortiAnalyzer Cloud 8.0.0, FortiAnalyzer Cloud 7.6.0 through 7.6.7, FortiAnalyzer Cloud 7.4.1 through 7.4.11, FortiAnalyzer Cloud 7.2.1 through 7.2.12, FortiManager 8.0.0, FortiManager 7.6.0 through 7.6.7, FortiManager 7.4.0 through 7.4.11, FortiManager 7.2.0 through 7.2.12, FortiManager Cloud 8.0.0, FortiManager Cloud 7.6.0 through 7.6.7, FortiManager Cloud 7.4.1 through 7.4.11, FortiManager Cloud 7.2.1 through 7.2.12 may allow an authenticated administrator to execute unauthorized code or commands via specially crafted requests | ||||
| CVE-2026-126183 | 1 Fortinet | 2 Fortimanager, Fortimanagercloud | 2026-11-13 | 8.7 High |
| A authorization bypass through user-controlled key vulnerability in Fortinet FortiManager 8.0.0 through 8.0.1, FortiManager 7.6.0 through 7.6.7, FortiManager 7.4.0 through 7.4.11, FortiManager 7.2.0 through 7.2.12, FortiManager Cloud 8.0.1, FortiManager Cloud 7.6.0 through 7.6.7, FortiManager Cloud 7.4.1 through 7.4.11, FortiManager Cloud 7.2.1 through 7.2.12 may allow an authenticated attacker to execute commands outside of the expected scope via specially crafted HTTP request. | ||||
| CVE-2026-126184 | 1 Fortinet | 4 Fortianalyzer, Fortianalyzercloud, Fortimanager and 1 more | 2026-11-13 | 8.2 High |
| A authentication bypass by spoofing vulnerability in Fortinet FortiAnalyzer 8.0.0 through 8.0.1, FortiAnalyzer 7.6.0 through 7.6.7, FortiAnalyzer 7.4.0 through 7.4.11, FortiAnalyzer 7.2.0 through 7.2.12, FortiAnalyzer Cloud 8.0.1, FortiAnalyzer Cloud 7.6.0 through 7.6.7, FortiAnalyzer Cloud 7.4.1 through 7.4.11, FortiAnalyzer Cloud 7.2.1 through 7.2.12, FortiManager 8.0.0 through 8.0.1, FortiManager 7.6.0 through 7.6.7, FortiManager 7.4.0 through 7.4.11, FortiManager 7.2.0 through 7.2.12, FortiManager Cloud 8.0.1, FortiManager Cloud 7.6.0 through 7.6.7, FortiManager Cloud 7.4.1 through 7.4.11, FortiManager Cloud 7.2.1 through 7.2.12 may allow an attacker to disrupt the HA state. | ||||
| CVE-2026-126185 | 1 Fortinet | 4 Fortianalyzer, Fortianalyzercloud, Fortimanager and 1 more | 2026-11-13 | 7.2 High |
| A improper control of generation of code ('code injection') vulnerability in Fortinet FortiAnalyzer 8.0.0 through 8.0.1, FortiAnalyzer 7.6.0 through 7.6.7, FortiAnalyzer 7.4.0 through 7.4.11, FortiAnalyzer Cloud 8.0.0 through 8.0.1, FortiAnalyzer Cloud 7.6.0 through 7.6.7, FortiAnalyzer Cloud 7.4.1 through 7.4.11, FortiManager 8.0.0 through 8.0.1, FortiManager 7.6.0 through 7.6.7, FortiManager 7.4.0 through 7.4.11, FortiManager Cloud 8.0.0 through 8.0.1, FortiManager Cloud 7.6.0 through 7.6.7, FortiManager Cloud 7.4.1 through 7.4.11 may allow an authenticated administrator to execute unauthorized code or commands via specially crafted requests. | ||||
| CVE-2026-126876 | 1 Google | 1 Chrome | 2026-11-13 | 8.8 High |
| Integer overflow in Skia in Google Chrome prior to 157.0.8103.78 allowed a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code inside the sandbox via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High) | ||||
| CVE-2026-126885 | 1 Google | 1 Chrome | 2026-11-13 | 9.6 Critical |
| Use after free in ServiceWorker in Google Chrome prior to 157.0.8103.78 allowed a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code outside the sandbox via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Critical) | ||||
| CVE-2026-126886 | 1 Google | 1 Chrome | 2026-11-13 | 8.8 High |
| Use after free in Frames in Google Chrome prior to 157.0.8103.78 allowed a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code inside the sandbox via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High) | ||||
| CVE-2026-126887 | 1 Google | 1 Chrome | 2026-11-13 | 8.8 High |
| Use after free in Animation in Google Chrome prior to 157.0.8103.78 allowed a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code inside the sandbox via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High) | ||||
| CVE-2026-126888 | 1 Google | 1 Chrome | 2026-11-13 | 8.8 High |
| Buffer overflow in Turbolev in Google Chrome prior to 157.0.8103.78 allowed a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code inside the sandbox via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High) | ||||
| CVE-2026-126889 | 1 Google | 1 Chrome | 2026-11-13 | 8.8 High |
| Off-by-one error in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 157.0.8103.78 allowed a remote attacker to potentially execute arbitrary code inside the sandbox via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High) | ||||
| CVE-2026-109091 | 1 X.org | 2 Xorg-x11-server, Xwayland | 2026-11-13 | 7.8 High |
| A buffer overflow in handling EDID Display-Range descriptors in X.Org xwayland before 24.1.15 and X Server before 21.1.26 could be used by malicious monitors to crash the x server or execute cote. | ||||
| CVE-2026-63079 | 2026-11-13 | 9.8 Critical | ||
| RBH Access Technologies Integra32 Security Management System 5.1.11 R5.0 contains an unauthenticated deserialization vulnerability in its deprecated .NET Remoting service, exposed on TCP port 2001 via the AxcvcLt.dll library using BinaryServerFormatterSinkProvider at TypeFilterLevel.Full without requiring authentication. A remote unauthenticated attacker can send a malicious serialized gadget payload (such as a ysoserial.net TypeConfuseDelegate chain) to the IntegraURI object endpoint, or exploit MarshalByRefObject/MarshalByValue unmarshalling for arbitrary file read/write and SMB/NTLMv2 credential coercion, to achieve remote code execution as NT AUTHORITY\SYSTEM and fully compromise the host. | ||||
| CVE-2026-126890 | 1 Google | 1 Chrome | 2026-11-13 | 8.8 High |
| Out of bounds read in Media in Google Chrome prior to 157.0.8103.78 allowed a remote attacker to potentially execute arbitrary code inside the sandbox via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High) | ||||
| CVE-2026-129094 | 2026-11-13 | 4.7 Medium | ||
| @utcp/http before 1.1.14 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability that allows remote manuals to reach loopback services by bypassing the remote-loopback check with a {host} placeholder. Attackers can supply host arguments like 127.0.0.1 or register tools via Streamable HTTP and SSE discovery to access internal services on the agent machine. | ||||
| CVE-2026-76844 | 1 Webpack.js | 1 Webpack-dev-middleware | 2026-11-13 | 7.4 High |
| webpack-dev-middleware 5.3.4, 6.1.2 through 6.1.3, 7.1.0 before 7.4.6, and 8.0.0 before 8.3.0 contains a path traversal vulnerability in getFilenameFromUrl that bypasses the fix for CVE-2024-29180: a publicPath without a trailing slash is matched by string prefix, and the '..' guard runs before that prefix is stripped. Unauthenticated attackers can request a path such as /assets../secret to read files one directory above the output directory when the middleware serves from the physical filesystem through writeToDisk or a custom outputFileSystem. | ||||
| CVE-2026-59597 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2026-11-13 | 8.4 High |
| In bindDataService of DataServiceManager.java, there is a possible way to retain privileged tunnel management permissions across configuration updates due to a logic error. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-59586 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2026-11-13 | 4.0 Medium |
| In multiple locations, there is a possible way to recover cryptographic keys and forge authentication tags due to improperly used crypto. This could lead to local information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-56919 | 2026-11-13 | 8.8 High | ||
| In PackageSignatureChecker of SystemUIGoogleModule.java, there is a possible background activity launch due to a confused deputy. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is needed for exploitation. | ||||