Export limit exceeded: 10013 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (10013 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2010-5333 | 2 Integard Home Project, Integard Pro Project | 2 Integard Home, Integard Pro | 2024-11-21 | 9.8 Critical |
| The web server in Integard Pro and Home before 2.0.0.9037 and 2.2.x before 2.2.0.9037 has a buffer overflow via a long password in an administration login POST request, leading to arbitrary code execution. An SEH-overwrite buffer overflow already existed for the vulnerable software. This CVE is to track an alternate exploitation method, utilizing an EIP-overwrite buffer overflow. | ||||
| CVE-2010-5332 | 1 Linux | 1 Linux Kernel | 2024-11-21 | 5.6 Medium |
| In the Linux kernel before 2.6.37, an out of bounds array access happened in drivers/net/mlx4/port.c. When searching for a free entry in either mlx4_register_vlan() or mlx4_register_mac(), and there is no free entry, the loop terminates without updating the local variable free thus causing out of array bounds access. | ||||
| CVE-2010-5331 | 1 Linux | 1 Linux Kernel | 2024-11-21 | 7.8 High |
| In the Linux kernel before 2.6.34, a range check issue in drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/atombios.c could cause an off by one (buffer overflow) problem. NOTE: At least one Linux maintainer believes that this CVE is incorrectly assigned and should be rejected because the value is hard coded and are not user-controllable where it is used | ||||
| CVE-2010-3844 | 2 Debian, Ettercap-project | 2 Debian Linux, Ettercap | 2024-11-21 | 8.8 High |
| An unchecked sscanf() call in ettercap before 0.7.5 allows an insecure temporary settings file to overflow a static-sized buffer on the stack. | ||||
| CVE-2009-5041 | 1 Debian | 1 Overkill | 2024-11-21 | 9.8 Critical |
| overkill has buffer overflow via long player names that can corrupt data on the server machine | ||||
| CVE-2009-4067 | 2 Linux, Redhat | 2 Linux Kernel, Enterprise Linux | 2024-11-21 | 6.8 Medium |
| Buffer overflow in the auerswald_probe function in the Auerswald Linux USB driver for the Linux kernel before 2.6.27 allows physically proximate attackers to execute arbitrary code, cause a denial of service via a crafted USB device, or take full control of the system. | ||||
| CVE-2009-0948 | 1 Apple | 1 Files | 2024-11-21 | 9.8 Critical |
| Multiple buffer overflows in the (1) cdf_read_sat, (2) cdf_read_long_sector_chain, and (3) cdf_read_ssat function in file before 5.02. | ||||
| CVE-2006-3100 | 1 Termpkg Project | 1 Termpkg | 2024-11-21 | 9.8 Critical |
| termpkg 3.3 suffers from buffer overflow. | ||||
| CVE-2005-3590 | 1 Gnu | 1 Glibc | 2024-11-21 | N/A |
| The getgrouplist function in the GNU C library (glibc) before version 2.3.5, when invoked with a zero argument, writes to the passed pointer even if the specified array size is zero, leading to a buffer overflow and potentially allowing attackers to corrupt memory. | ||||
| CVE-2024-8946 | 1 Micropython | 1 Micropython | 2024-09-24 | 7.3 High |
| A vulnerability was found in MicroPython 1.23.0. It has been classified as critical. Affected is the function mp_vfs_umount of the file extmod/vfs.c of the component VFS Unmount Handler. The manipulation leads to heap-based buffer overflow. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The name of the patch is 29943546343c92334e8518695a11fc0e2ceea68b. It is recommended to apply a patch to fix this issue. In the VFS unmount process, the comparison between the mounted path string and the unmount requested string is based solely on the length of the unmount string, which can lead to a heap buffer overflow read. | ||||
| CVE-2024-8948 | 1 Micropython | 1 Micropython | 2024-09-23 | 7.3 High |
| A vulnerability was found in MicroPython 1.23.0. It has been rated as critical. Affected by this issue is the function mpz_as_bytes of the file py/objint.c. The manipulation leads to heap-based buffer overflow. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The patch is identified as 908ab1ceca15ee6fd0ef82ca4cba770a3ec41894. It is recommended to apply a patch to fix this issue. In micropython objint component, converting zero from int to bytes leads to heap buffer-overflow-write at mpz_as_bytes. | ||||
| CVE-2020-24979 | 2023-11-07 | 5.5 Medium | ||
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none | ||||
| CVE-2019-20509 | 1 Libarchive | 1 Libarchive | 2023-11-07 | 6.5 Medium |
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it only affected a development version. Notes: none | ||||
| CVE-2018-9306 | 1 Redhat | 1 Enterprise Linux | 2023-11-07 | N/A |
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2017-17724. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2017-17724. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2017-17724 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | ||||
| CVE-2018-9146 | 2023-11-07 | N/A | ||
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2017-17724. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2017-17724. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2017-17724 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | ||||
| CVE-2018-9060 | 2023-11-07 | N/A | ||
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none | ||||
| CVE-2018-7574 | 2023-11-07 | N/A | ||
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2018-7576, CVE-2018-21233. Reason: this candidate was intended for one issue, but the description and references inadvertently combined multiple issues. Notes: All CVE users should consult CVE-2018-7576 and CVE-2018-21233 to determine which ID is appropriate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | ||||
| CVE-2018-19270 | 2023-11-07 | N/A | ||
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2018-16276. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2018-16276. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2018-16276 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | ||||
| CVE-2018-14378 | 2023-11-07 | N/A | ||
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none | ||||
| CVE-2018-14375 | 2023-11-07 | N/A | ||
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none | ||||