Export limit exceeded: 10070 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (10070 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2023-2110 | 4 Apple, Linux, Microsoft and 1 more | 4 Macos, Linux Kernel, Windows and 1 more | 2024-11-21 | 8.2 High |
| Improper path handling in Obsidian desktop before 1.2.8 on Windows, Linux and macOS allows a crafted webpage to access local files and exfiltrate them to remote web servers via "app://local/<absolute-path>". This vulnerability can be exploited if a user opens a malicious markdown file in Obsidian, or copies text from a malicious webpage and paste it into Obsidian. | ||||
| CVE-2022-4185 | 2 Apple, Google | 2 Iphone Os, Chrome | 2024-11-21 | 4.3 Medium |
| Inappropriate implementation in Navigation in Google Chrome on iOS prior to 108.0.5359.71 allowed a remote attacker to spoof the contents of the modal dialogue via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium) | ||||
| CVE-2022-38434 | 3 Adobe, Apple, Microsoft | 3 Photoshop, Macos, Windows | 2024-11-21 | 7.8 High |
| Adobe Photoshop versions 22.5.8 (and earlier) and 23.4.2 (and earlier) are affected by a Use After Free vulnerability that could result in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must open a malicious file. | ||||
| CVE-2022-37724 | 1 Apple | 1 Webobjects | 2024-11-21 | 6.1 Medium |
| Project Wonder WebObjects 1.0 through 5.4.3 is vulnerable to Arbitrary HTTP Header injection and URL- or Header-based XSS reflection in all web-server adaptor interfaces. | ||||
| CVE-2022-30660 | 3 Adobe, Apple, Microsoft | 3 Indesign, Macos, Windows | 2024-11-21 | N/A |
| Adobe InDesign versions 17.2.1 (and earlier) and 16.4.1 (and earlier) are affected by an out-of-bounds write vulnerability that could result in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must open a malicious file. | ||||
| CVE-2022-28883 | 3 Apple, F-secure, Microsoft | 9 Macos, Atlant, Cloud Protection For Salesforce and 6 more | 2024-11-21 | 3.5 Low |
| A Denial-of-Service (DoS) vulnerability was discovered in F-Secure & WithSecure products whereby the aerdl unpack function crashes. This can lead to a possible scanning engine crash. The exploit can be triggered remotely by an attacker. | ||||
| CVE-2022-28882 | 3 Apple, F-secure, Microsoft | 9 Macos, Atlant, Cloud Protection For Salesforce and 6 more | 2024-11-21 | 4.3 Medium |
| A Denial-of-Service (DoS) vulnerability was discovered in F-Secure & WithSecure products whereby the aegen.dll will go into an infinite loop when unpacking PE files. This eventually leads to scanning engine crash. The exploit can be triggered remotely by an attacker. | ||||
| CVE-2022-26704 | 1 Apple | 2 Mac Os X, Macos | 2024-11-21 | 7.8 High |
| A validation issue existed in the handling of symlinks and was addressed with improved validation of symlinks. This issue is fixed in macOS Monterey 12.4. An app may be able to gain elevated privileges. | ||||
| CVE-2022-24070 | 5 Apache, Apple, Debian and 2 more | 7 Subversion, Macos, Debian Linux and 4 more | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 High |
| Subversion's mod_dav_svn is vulnerable to memory corruption. While looking up path-based authorization rules, mod_dav_svn servers may attempt to use memory which has already been freed. Affected Subversion mod_dav_svn servers 1.10.0 through 1.14.1 (inclusive). Servers that do not use mod_dav_svn are not affected. | ||||
| CVE-2022-22721 | 6 Apache, Apple, Debian and 3 more | 11 Http Server, Mac Os X, Macos and 8 more | 2024-11-21 | 9.1 Critical |
| If LimitXMLRequestBody is set to allow request bodies larger than 350MB (defaults to 1M) on 32 bit systems an integer overflow happens which later causes out of bounds writes. This issue affects Apache HTTP Server 2.4.52 and earlier. | ||||
| CVE-2022-22719 | 6 Apache, Apple, Debian and 3 more | 9 Http Server, Mac Os X, Macos and 6 more | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 High |
| A carefully crafted request body can cause a read to a random memory area which could cause the process to crash. This issue affects Apache HTTP Server 2.4.52 and earlier. | ||||
| CVE-2022-22639 | 1 Apple | 3 Ipados, Iphone Os, Macos | 2024-11-21 | 7.8 High |
| A logic issue was addressed with improved state management. This issue is fixed in iOS 15.4 and iPadOS 15.4, macOS Monterey 12.3. An application may be able to gain elevated privileges. | ||||
| CVE-2022-22594 | 2 Apple, Redhat | 8 Ipados, Iphone Os, Macos and 5 more | 2024-11-21 | 6.5 Medium |
| A cross-origin issue in the IndexDB API was addressed with improved input validation. This issue is fixed in iOS 15.3 and iPadOS 15.3, watchOS 8.4, tvOS 15.3, Safari 15.3, macOS Monterey 12.2. A website may be able to track sensitive user information. | ||||
| CVE-2022-1642 | 1 Apple | 1 Swift | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 High |
| A program using swift-corelibs-foundation is vulnerable to a denial of service attack caused by a potentially malicious source producing a JSON document containing a type mismatch. This vulnerability is caused by the interaction between a deserialization mechanism offered by the Swift standard library, the Codable protocol; and the JSONDecoder class offered by swift-corelibs-foundation, which can deserialize types that adopt the Codable protocol based on the content of a provided JSON document. When a type that adopts Codable requests the initialization of a field with an integer value, the JSONDecoder class uses a type-erased container with different accessor methods to attempt and coerce a corresponding JSON value and produce an integer. In the case the JSON value was a numeric literal with a floating-point portion, JSONDecoder used different type-eraser methods during validation than it did during the final casting of the value. The checked casting produces a deterministic crash due to this mismatch. The JSONDecoder class is often wrapped by popular Swift-based web frameworks to parse the body of HTTP requests and perform basic type validation. This makes the attack low-effort: sending a specifically crafted JSON document during a request to these endpoints will cause them to crash. The attack does not have any confidentiality or integrity risks in and of itself; the crash is produced deterministically by an abort function that ensures that execution does not continue in the face of this violation of assumptions. However, unexpected crashes can lead to violations of invariants in services, so it's possible that this attack can be used to trigger error conditions that escalate the risk. Producing a denial of service may also be the goal of an attacker in itself. This issue is solved in Swift 5.6.2 for Linux and Windows. This issue was solved by ensuring that the same methods are invoked both when validating and during casting, so that no type mismatch occurs. Swift for Linux and Windows versions are not ABI-interchangeable. To upgrade a service, its owner must update to this version of the Swift toolchain, then recompile and redeploy their software. The new version of Swift includes an updated swift-corelibs-foundation package. Versions of Swift running on Darwin-based operating systems are not affected. | ||||
| CVE-2021-45067 | 3 Adobe, Apple, Microsoft | 6 Acrobat, Acrobat Dc, Acrobat Reader and 3 more | 2024-11-21 | 5.5 Medium |
| Acrobat Reader DC version 21.007.20099 (and earlier), 20.004.30017 (and earlier) and 17.011.30204 (and earlier) are affected by an Access of Memory Location After End of Buffer vulnerability that could lead to disclosure of sensitive memory. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to bypass mitigations such as ASLR. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must open a malicious file. | ||||
| CVE-2021-45064 | 3 Adobe, Apple, Microsoft | 6 Acrobat, Acrobat Dc, Acrobat Reader and 3 more | 2024-11-21 | 7.8 High |
| Acrobat Reader DC version 21.007.20099 (and earlier), 20.004.30017 (and earlier) and 17.011.30204 (and earlier) are affected by a use-after-free vulnerability in the processing of Format event actions that could result in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must open a malicious file. | ||||
| CVE-2021-45063 | 3 Adobe, Apple, Microsoft | 6 Acrobat, Acrobat Dc, Acrobat Reader and 3 more | 2024-11-21 | 5.5 Medium |
| Acrobat Reader DC version 21.007.20099 (and earlier), 20.004.30017 (and earlier) and 17.011.30204 (and earlier) are affected by a use-after-free vulnerability in the processing of Format event actions that could lead to disclosure of sensitive memory. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to bypass mitigations such as ASLR. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must open a malicious file. | ||||
| CVE-2021-45062 | 3 Adobe, Apple, Microsoft | 6 Acrobat, Acrobat Dc, Acrobat Reader and 3 more | 2024-11-21 | 7.8 High |
| Acrobat Reader DC version 21.007.20099 (and earlier), 20.004.30017 (and earlier) and 17.011.30204 (and earlier) are affected by a use-after-free vulnerability in the processing of Format event actions that could result in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must open a malicious file. | ||||
| CVE-2021-45061 | 3 Adobe, Apple, Microsoft | 6 Acrobat, Acrobat Dc, Acrobat Reader and 3 more | 2024-11-21 | 7.8 High |
| Acrobat Reader DC version 21.007.20099 (and earlier), 20.004.30017 (and earlier) and 17.011.30204 (and earlier) are affected by an out-of-bounds write vulnerability that could result in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must open a malicious file. | ||||
| CVE-2021-45060 | 3 Adobe, Apple, Microsoft | 6 Acrobat, Acrobat Dc, Acrobat Reader and 3 more | 2024-11-21 | 7.8 High |
| Acrobat Reader DC version 21.007.20099 (and earlier), 20.004.30017 (and earlier) and 17.011.30204 (and earlier) are affected by an out-of-bounds read vulnerability when parsing a crafted file, which could result in a read past the end of an allocated memory structure. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current user. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must open a malicious file. | ||||