Export limit exceeded: 11435 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (11435 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2025-9001 | 1 Lemonos | 2 Http Client, Lemonos | 2025-09-11 | 5.3 Medium |
| A vulnerability was determined in LemonOS up to nightly-2024-07-12 on LemonOS. Affected by this issue is the function HTTPGet of the file /Applications/Steal/main.cpp of the component HTTP Client. The manipulation of the argument chunkSize leads to stack-based buffer overflow. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. | ||||
| CVE-2025-9019 | 2 Appneta, Broadcom | 2 Tcpreplay, Tcpreplay | 2025-09-11 | 3.1 Low |
| A vulnerability has been found in tcpreplay 4.5.1. This vulnerability affects the function mask_cidr6 of the file cidr.c of the component tcpprep. The manipulation leads to heap-based buffer overflow. The attack can be initiated remotely. The complexity of an attack is rather high. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The researcher is able to reproduce this with the latest official release 4.5.1 and the current master branch. The code maintainer cannot reproduce this for 4.5.2-beta1. In his reply the maintainer explains that "[i]n that case, this is a duplicate that was fixed in 4.5.2." | ||||
| CVE-2025-56498 | 2 Boa, Prolink2u | 3 Boa, Pgn6401v, Pgn6401v Firmware | 2025-09-09 | 5.3 Medium |
| An OS command injection vulnerability exists in PLDT WiFi Router's Prolink PGN6401V Firmware 8.1.2 web management interface. The ping6.asp page submits user input to the /boaform/formPing6 endpoint via the pingAddr parameter, which is not properly sanitized. An authenticated attacker can exploit this flaw by injecting arbitrary system commands, which are executed by the underlying operating system with root privileges. The router uses the Boa web server (version 0.93.15) to handle the request. Successful exploitation can lead to full system compromise and unauthorized control of the network device. | ||||
| CVE-2021-20039 | 1 Sonicwall | 10 Sma 200, Sma 200 Firmware, Sma 210 and 7 more | 2025-09-05 | 8.8 High |
| Improper neutralization of special elements in the SMA100 management interface '/cgi-bin/viewcert' POST http method allows a remote authenticated attacker to inject arbitrary commands as a 'nobody' user. This vulnerability affected SMA 200, 210, 400, 410 and 500v appliances. | ||||
| CVE-2025-8818 | 1 Linksys | 12 Re6250, Re6250 Firmware, Re6300 and 9 more | 2025-09-04 | 6.3 Medium |
| A vulnerability has been found in Linksys RE6250, RE6300, RE6350, RE6500, RE7000 and RE9000 up to 20250801. Affected by this issue is the function setDFSSetting of the file /goform/setLan. The manipulation of the argument lanNetmask/lanIp leads to os command injection. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way. | ||||
| CVE-2025-8821 | 1 Linksys | 12 Re6250, Re6250 Firmware, Re6300 and 9 more | 2025-09-04 | 6.3 Medium |
| A vulnerability was identified in Linksys RE6250, RE6300, RE6350, RE6500, RE7000 and RE9000 up to 20250801. This issue affects the function RP_setBasic of the file /goform/RP_setBasic. The manipulation of the argument bssid leads to os command injection. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way. | ||||
| CVE-2025-8823 | 1 Linksys | 12 Re6250, Re6250 Firmware, Re6300 and 9 more | 2025-09-04 | 6.3 Medium |
| A vulnerability was found in Linksys RE6250, RE6300, RE6350, RE6500, RE7000 and RE9000 up to 20250801. Affected by this vulnerability is the function setDeviceName of the file /goform/setDeviceName. The manipulation of the argument DeviceName leads to os command injection. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way. | ||||
| CVE-2025-8825 | 1 Linksys | 12 Re6250, Re6250 Firmware, Re6300 and 9 more | 2025-09-04 | 6.3 Medium |
| A vulnerability was identified in Linksys RE6250, RE6300, RE6350, RE6500, RE7000 and RE9000 up to 20250801. This affects the function RP_setBasicAuto of the file /goform/RP_setBasicAuto. The manipulation of the argument staticIp/staticNetmask leads to os command injection. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way. | ||||
| CVE-2025-8827 | 1 Linksys | 12 Re6250, Re6250 Firmware, Re6300 and 9 more | 2025-09-04 | 6.3 Medium |
| A vulnerability was found in Linksys RE6250, RE6300, RE6350, RE6500, RE7000 and RE9000 up to 20250801. This issue affects the function um_inspect_cross_band of the file /goform/RP_setBasicAuto. The manipulation of the argument staticGateway leads to os command injection. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way. | ||||
| CVE-2025-8828 | 1 Linksys | 12 Re6250, Re6250 Firmware, Re6300 and 9 more | 2025-09-04 | 6.3 Medium |
| A vulnerability was determined in Linksys RE6250, RE6300, RE6350, RE6500, RE7000 and RE9000 up to 20250801. Affected is the function ipv6cmd of the file /goform/setIpv6. The manipulation of the argument Ipv6PriDns/Ipv6SecDns/Ipv6StaticGateway/LanIpv6Addr/LanPrefixLen/pppoeUser/pppoePass/pppoeIdleTime/pppoeRedialPeriod/Ipv6in4_PrefixLen/LocalIpv6/RemoteIpv4/LanIPv6_Prefix/LanPrefixLen/ipv6to4Relay/ipv6rdRelay/tunrd_PrefixLen/wan_UseLinkLocal/Ipv6StaticIp/Ipv6PrefixLen leads to os command injection. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way. | ||||
| CVE-2025-8829 | 1 Linksys | 12 Re6250, Re6250 Firmware, Re6300 and 9 more | 2025-09-04 | 6.3 Medium |
| A vulnerability was identified in Linksys RE6250, RE6300, RE6350, RE6500, RE7000 and RE9000 up to 20250801. Affected by this vulnerability is the function um_red of the file /goform/RP_setBasicAuto. The manipulation of the argument hname leads to os command injection. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way. | ||||
| CVE-2025-8830 | 1 Linksys | 12 Re6250, Re6250 Firmware, Re6300 and 9 more | 2025-09-04 | 6.3 Medium |
| A vulnerability has been found in Linksys RE6250, RE6300, RE6350, RE6500, RE7000 and RE9000 up to 20250801. Affected by this issue is the function sub_3517C of the file /goform/setWan. The manipulation of the argument Hostname leads to os command injection. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way. | ||||
| CVE-2018-6349 | 1 Whatsapp | 2 Whatsapp, Whatsapp Business | 2025-09-03 | 9.8 Critical |
| When receiving calls using WhatsApp for Android, a missing size check when parsing a sender-provided packet allowed for a stack-based overflow. This issue affects WhatsApp for Android prior to 2.18.248 and WhatsApp Business for Android prior to 2.18.132. | ||||
| CVE-2018-20655 | 1 Whatsapp | 2 Whatsapp, Whatsapp Business | 2025-09-03 | 9.8 Critical |
| When receiving calls using WhatsApp for iOS, a missing size check when parsing a sender-provided packet allowed for a stack-based overflow. This issue affects WhatsApp for iOS prior to v2.18.90.24 and WhatsApp Business for iOS prior to v2.18.90.24. | ||||
| CVE-2014-8098 | 3 Debian, Redhat, X.org | 5 Debian Linux, Enterprise Linux, X11 and 2 more | 2025-08-29 | N/A |
| The GLX extension in XFree86 4.0, X.Org X Window System (aka X11 or X) X11R6.7, and X.Org Server (aka xserver and xorg-server) before 1.16.3 allows remote authenticated users to cause a denial of service (out-of-bounds read or write) or possibly execute arbitrary code via a crafted length or index value to the (1) __glXDisp_Render, (2) __glXDisp_RenderLarge, (3) __glXDispSwap_VendorPrivate, (4) __glXDispSwap_VendorPrivateWithReply, (5) set_client_info, (6) __glXDispSwap_SetClientInfoARB, (7) DoSwapInterval, (8) DoGetProgramString, (9) DoGetString, (10) __glXDispSwap_RenderMode, (11) __glXDisp_GetCompressedTexImage, (12) __glXDispSwap_GetCompressedTexImage, (13) __glXDisp_FeedbackBuffer, (14) __glXDispSwap_FeedbackBuffer, (15) __glXDisp_SelectBuffer, (16) __glXDispSwap_SelectBuffer, (17) __glXDisp_Flush, (18) __glXDispSwap_Flush, (19) __glXDisp_Finish, (20) __glXDispSwap_Finish, (21) __glXDisp_ReadPixels, (22) __glXDispSwap_ReadPixels, (23) __glXDisp_GetTexImage, (24) __glXDispSwap_GetTexImage, (25) __glXDisp_GetPolygonStipple, (26) __glXDispSwap_GetPolygonStipple, (27) __glXDisp_GetSeparableFilter, (28) __glXDisp_GetSeparableFilterEXT, (29) __glXDisp_GetConvolutionFilter, (30) __glXDisp_GetConvolutionFilterEXT, (31) __glXDisp_GetHistogram, (32) __glXDisp_GetHistogramEXT, (33) __glXDisp_GetMinmax, (34) __glXDisp_GetMinmaxEXT, (35) __glXDisp_GetColorTable, (36) __glXDisp_GetColorTableSGI, (37) GetSeparableFilter, (38) GetConvolutionFilter, (39) GetHistogram, (40) GetMinmax, or (41) GetColorTable function. | ||||
| CVE-2020-17131 | 1 Microsoft | 4 Chakracore, Edge, Windows 10 and 1 more | 2025-08-28 | 4.2 Medium |
| Chakra Scripting Engine Memory Corruption Vulnerability | ||||
| CVE-2025-3632 | 1 Ibm | 2 4769 Developers Toolkit, Common Cryptographic Architecture | 2025-08-28 | 7.5 High |
| IBM 4769 Developers Toolkit 7.0.0 through 7.5.52 could allow a remote attacker to cause a denial of service in the Hardware Security Module (HSM) due to improper memory allocation of an excessive size. | ||||
| CVE-2020-36518 | 5 Debian, Fasterxml, Netapp and 2 more | 49 Debian Linux, Jackson-databind, Active Iq Unified Manager and 46 more | 2025-08-27 | 7.5 High |
| jackson-databind before 2.13.0 allows a Java StackOverflow exception and denial of service via a large depth of nested objects. | ||||
| CVE-2024-21145 | 3 Netapp, Oracle, Redhat | 15 Bluexp, Cloud Insights Storage Workload Security Agent, Oncommand Insight and 12 more | 2025-08-26 | 4.8 Medium |
| Vulnerability in the Oracle Java SE, Oracle GraalVM for JDK, Oracle GraalVM Enterprise Edition product of Oracle Java SE (component: 2D). Supported versions that are affected are Oracle Java SE: 8u411, 8u411-perf, 11.0.23, 17.0.11, 21.0.3, 22.0.1; Oracle GraalVM for JDK: 17.0.11, 21.0.3, 22.0.1; Oracle GraalVM Enterprise Edition: 20.3.14 and 21.3.10. Difficult to exploit vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via multiple protocols to compromise Oracle Java SE, Oracle GraalVM for JDK, Oracle GraalVM Enterprise Edition. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized update, insert or delete access to some of Oracle Java SE, Oracle GraalVM for JDK, Oracle GraalVM Enterprise Edition accessible data as well as unauthorized read access to a subset of Oracle Java SE, Oracle GraalVM for JDK, Oracle GraalVM Enterprise Edition accessible data. Note: This vulnerability can be exploited by using APIs in the specified Component, e.g., through a web service which supplies data to the APIs. This vulnerability also applies to Java deployments, typically in clients running sandboxed Java Web Start applications or sandboxed Java applets, that load and run untrusted code (e.g., code that comes from the internet) and rely on the Java sandbox for security. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 4.8 (Confidentiality and Integrity impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N). | ||||
| CVE-2025-54135 | 2 Anysphere, Cursor | 2 Cursor, Cursor | 2025-08-25 | 8.6 High |
| Cursor is a code editor built for programming with AI. Cursor allows writing in-workspace files with no user approval in versions below 1.3.9, If the file is a dotfile, editing it requires approval but creating a new one doesn't. Hence, if sensitive MCP files, such as the .cursor/mcp.json file don't already exist in the workspace, an attacker can chain a indirect prompt injection vulnerability to hijack the context to write to the settings file and trigger RCE on the victim without user approval. This is fixed in version 1.3.9. | ||||