Export limit exceeded: 31226 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 10873 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (10873 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2025-11206 | 4 Apple, Google, Linux and 1 more | 4 Macos, Chrome, Linux Kernel and 1 more | 2026-02-26 | 7.1 High |
| Heap buffer overflow in Video in Google Chrome prior to 141.0.7390.54 allowed a remote attacker to potentially perform a sandbox escape via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High) | ||||
| CVE-2025-66644 | 1 Arraynetworks | 15 Ag1000, Ag1000t, Ag1000v5 and 12 more | 2026-02-26 | 7.2 High |
| Array Networks ArrayOS AG before 9.4.5.9 allows command injection, as exploited in the wild in August through December 2025. | ||||
| CVE-2025-48623 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2026-02-26 | 7.8 High |
| In init_pkvm_hyp_vcpu of pkvm.c, there is a possible out of bounds write due to improper input validation. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2025-48624 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2026-02-26 | 7.8 High |
| In multiple functions of arm-smmu-v3.c, there is a possible out-of-bounds write due to improper input validation. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2025-48638 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2026-02-26 | 7.8 High |
| In __pkvm_load_tracing of trace.c, there is a possible out-of-bounds write due to improper input validation. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2025-53949 | 1 Fortinet | 1 Fortisandbox | 2026-02-26 | 7 High |
| An Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection') vulnerability [CWE-78] vulnerability in Fortinet FortiSandbox 5.0.0 through 5.0.2, FortiSandbox 4.4.0 through 4.4.7, FortiSandbox 4.2 all versions, FortiSandbox 4.0 all versions may allow an authenticated attacker to execute unauthorized code on the underlying system via crafted HTTP requests. | ||||
| CVE-2025-53679 | 1 Fortinet | 3 Fortisandbox, Fortisandbox Cloud, Fortisandboxcloud | 2026-02-26 | 6.9 Medium |
| An improper neutralization of special elements used in an OS command ('OS Command Injection') vulnerability [CWE-78] vulnerability in Fortinet FortiSandbox 5.0.0 through 5.0.2, FortiSandbox 4.4.0 through 4.4.7, FortiSandbox 4.2 all versions, FortiSandbox 4.0 all versions, FortiSandbox Cloud 24.1, FortiSandbox Cloud 23 all versions allows a remote privileged attacker to execute unauthorized code or commands via crafted HTTP or HTTPS requests. | ||||
| CVE-2025-36924 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2026-02-26 | 8 High |
| In ss_DecodeLcsAssistDataReqMsg(void) of ss_LcsManagement.c, there is a possible out of bounds write due to an incorrect bounds check. This could lead to remote (proximal/adjacent) escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2025-36925 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2026-02-26 | 7.8 High |
| In WAVES_send_data_to_dsp of libaoc_waves.c, there is a possible out of bounds write due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2025-36927 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2026-02-26 | 7.8 High |
| In GetTachyonCommand of tachyon_server_common.h, there is a possible out of bounds write due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2025-36928 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2026-02-26 | 7.8 High |
| In GetHostAddress of gxp_buffer.h, there is a possible out of bounds write due to an incorrect bounds check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2025-36930 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2026-02-26 | 7.8 High |
| In GetHostAddress of gxp_buffer.h, there is a possible out of bounds write due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2025-36931 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2026-02-26 | 7.8 High |
| In GetHostAddress of gxp_buffer.h, there is a possible out of bounds write due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2025-36935 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2026-02-26 | 7.8 High |
| In trusty_ffa_mem_reclaim of shared-mem-smcall.c, there is a possible memory corruption due to uninitialized data. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2025-36937 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2026-02-26 | 9.8 Critical |
| In AudioDecoder::HandleProduceRequest of audio_decoder.cc, there is a possible out of bounds write due to an incorrect bounds check. This could lead to remote code execution with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2018-5410 | 1 Dokan-dev | 1 Dokany | 2026-02-25 | 7.8 High |
| Dokan, versions between 1.0.0.5000 and 1.2.0.1000, are vulnerable to a stack-based buffer overflow in the dokan1.sys driver. An attacker can create a device handle to the system driver and send arbitrary input that will trigger the vulnerability. This vulnerability was introduced in the 1.0.0.5000 version update. | ||||
| CVE-2022-22989 | 1 Westerndigital | 11 My Cloud, My Cloud Dl2100, My Cloud Dl4100 and 8 more | 2026-02-24 | 9.8 Critical |
| My Cloud OS 5 was vulnerable to a pre-authenticated stack overflow vulnerability on the FTP service that could be exploited by unauthenticated attackers on the network. Addressed the vulnerability by adding defenses against stack overflow issues. | ||||
| CVE-2021-31854 | 1 Mcafee | 1 Agent | 2026-02-24 | 7.7 High |
| A command Injection Vulnerability in McAfee Agent (MA) for Windows prior to 5.7.5 allows local users to inject arbitrary shell code into the file cleanup.exe. The malicious clean.exe file is placed into the relevant folder and executed by running the McAfee Agent deployment feature located in the System Tree. An attacker may exploit the vulnerability to obtain a reverse shell which can lead to privilege escalation to obtain root privileges. | ||||
| CVE-2021-31838 | 1 Mcafee | 1 Mvision Edr | 2026-02-24 | 8.4 High |
| A command injection vulnerability in MVISION EDR (MVEDR) prior to 3.4.0 allows an authenticated MVEDR administrator to trigger the EDR client to execute arbitrary commands through PowerShell using the EDR functionality 'execute reaction'. | ||||
| CVE-2020-0878 | 1 Microsoft | 18 Chakracore, Edge, Internet Explorer and 15 more | 2026-02-23 | 4.2 Medium |
| <p>A remote code execution vulnerability exists in the way that Microsoft browsers access objects in memory. The vulnerability could corrupt memory in a way that could allow an attacker to execute arbitrary code in the context of the current user. An attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability could gain the same user rights as the current user. If the current user is logged on with administrative user rights, the attacker could take control of an affected system. An attacker could then install programs; view, change, or delete data; or create new accounts with full user rights.</p> <p>An attacker could host a specially crafted website that is designed to exploit the vulnerability through Microsoft browsers, and then convince a user to view the website. The attacker could also take advantage of compromised websites, or websites that accept or host user-provided content or advertisements, by adding specially crafted content that could exploit the vulnerability. In all cases, however, an attacker would have no way to force users to view the attacker-controlled content. Instead, an attacker would have to convince users to take action, typically via an enticement in email or instant message, or by getting them to open an email attachment.</p> <p>The security update addresses the vulnerability by modifying how Microsoft browsers handle objects in memory.</p> | ||||