Search
Search Results (5 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2015-4748 | 2 Oracle, Redhat | 7 Jdk, Jre, Jrockit and 4 more | 2026-10-14 | N/A |
| Unspecified vulnerability in Oracle Java SE 6u95, 7u80, and 8u45; JRockit R28.3.6; and Java SE Embedded 7u75 and Embedded 8u33 allows remote attackers to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability via unknown vectors related to Security. | ||||
| CVE-2020-16228 | 1 Philips | 24 Intellivue Mp2-mp90, Intellivue Mp2-mp90 Firmware, Intellivue Mx100 and 21 more | 2026-02-23 | 6.4 Medium |
| In Patient Information Center iX (PICiX) Versions C.02 and C.03, PerformanceBridge Focal Point Version A.01, IntelliVue patient monitors MX100, MX400-MX550, MX750, MX850, and IntelliVue X3 Versions N and prior, the software does not check or incorrectly checks the revocation status of a certificate, which may cause it to use a compromised certificate. | ||||
| CVE-2015-4680 | 2 Freeradius, Suse | 3 Freeradius, Linux Enterprise Server, Linux Enterprise Software Development Kit | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| FreeRADIUS 2.2.x before 2.2.8 and 3.0.x before 3.0.9 does not properly check revocation of intermediate CA certificates. | ||||
| CVE-2020-1675 | 1 Juniper | 1 Mist Cloud Ui | 2024-11-21 | 8.3 High |
| When Security Assertion Markup Language (SAML) authentication is enabled, Juniper Networks Mist Cloud UI might incorrectly process invalid authentication certificates which could allow a malicious network-based user to access unauthorized data. This issue affects all Juniper Networks Mist Cloud UI versions prior to September 2 2020. | ||||
| CVE-2017-15698 | 3 Apache, Debian, Redhat | 3 Tomcat Native, Debian Linux, Jboss Enterprise Web Server | 2024-11-21 | N/A |
| When parsing the AIA-Extension field of a client certificate, Apache Tomcat Native Connector 1.2.0 to 1.2.14 and 1.1.23 to 1.1.34 did not correctly handle fields longer than 127 bytes. The result of the parsing error was to skip the OCSP check. It was therefore possible for client certificates that should have been rejected (if the OCSP check had been made) to be accepted. Users not using OCSP checks are not affected by this vulnerability. | ||||
Page 1 of 1.