| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| Buffer overflow in the auerswald_probe function in the Auerswald Linux USB driver for the Linux kernel before 2.6.27 allows physically proximate attackers to execute arbitrary code, cause a denial of service via a crafted USB device, or take full control of the system. |
| In RHEV-M VDC 2.2.0, it was found that the SSL certificate was not verified when using the client-side Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization Manager interface (a Windows Presentation Foundation (WPF) XAML browser application) to connect to the Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization Manager. An attacker on the local network could use this flaw to conduct a man-in-the-middle attack, tricking the user into thinking they are viewing the Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization Manager when the content is actually attacker-controlled, or modifying actions a user requested Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization Manager to perform. |
| frysk packages through 2008-08-05 as shipped in Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 are built with an insecure RPATH set in the ELF header of multiple binaries in /usr/bin/f* (e.g. fcore, fcatch, fstack, fstep, ...) shipped in the package. A local attacker can exploit this vulnerability by running arbitrary code as another user. |
| There is a possible tty hijacking in shadow 4.x before 4.1.5 and sudo 1.x before 1.7.4 via "su - user -c program". The user session can be escaped to the parent session by using the TIOCSTI ioctl to push characters into the input buffer to be read by the next process. |
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This was originally intended for a report about TCP Wrappers and the hosts_ctl API function, but further investigation showed that this was documented behavior by that function. Notes: Future CVE identifiers might be assigned to applications that mis-use the API in a security-relevant fashion. |
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2012-6062. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2012-6062. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2012-6062 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. |
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2012-6060. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2012-6060. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2012-6060 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. |
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2012-6059. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2012-6059. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2012-6059 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. |
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2012-6061. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2012-6061. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2012-6061 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. |
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2012-6056. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2012-6056. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2012-6056 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. |
| Non Security Issue. See the binutils security policy for more details, https://sourceware.org/cgit/binutils-gdb/tree/binutils/SECURITY.txt |
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2021-29457. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2021-29457. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2021-29457 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage |
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Notes: none |
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2020-2891 |
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2019. Notes: none. |
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2017-17724. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2017-17724. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2017-17724 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage |
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2018-4300. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2018-4300. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2018-4300 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage |
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none |
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2017. Notes: none |
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Notes: none |
