Search
Search Results (1190 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2014-10071 | 3 Canonical, Redhat, Zsh | 3 Ubuntu Linux, Enterprise Linux, Zsh | 2024-11-21 | N/A |
| In exec.c in zsh before 5.0.7, there is a buffer overflow for very long fds in the ">& fd" syntax. | ||||
| CVE-2013-7490 | 2 Canonical, Perl | 2 Ubuntu Linux, Dbi | 2024-11-21 | 5.3 Medium |
| An issue was discovered in the DBI module before 1.632 for Perl. Using many arguments to methods for Callbacks may lead to memory corruption. | ||||
| CVE-2013-4357 | 5 Canonical, Debian, Eglibc and 2 more | 5 Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux, Eglibc and 2 more | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 High |
| The eglibc package before 2.14 incorrectly handled the getaddrinfo() function. An attacker could use this issue to cause a denial of service. | ||||
| CVE-2011-3630 | 3 Debian, Hardlink Project, Redhat | 3 Debian Linux, Hardlink, Enterprise Linux | 2024-11-21 | 8.8 High |
| Hardlink before 0.1.2 suffer from multiple stack-based buffer overflow flaws because of the way directory trees with deeply nested directories are processed. A remote attacker could provide a specially-crafted directory tree, and trick the local user into consolidating it, leading to hardlink executable crash, or, potentially arbitrary code execution with the privileges of the user running the hardlink executable. | ||||
| CVE-2018-9060 | 2023-11-07 | N/A | ||
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none | ||||
| CVE-2018-14378 | 2023-11-07 | N/A | ||
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none | ||||
| CVE-2018-14375 | 2023-11-07 | N/A | ||
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none | ||||
| CVE-2018-14374 | 2023-11-07 | N/A | ||
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none | ||||
| CVE-2018-14373 | 2023-11-07 | N/A | ||
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none | ||||
| CVE-2012-6686 | 1 Redhat | 1 Enterprise Linux | 2023-11-07 | N/A |
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2013-4357. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2013-4357. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2013-4357 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | ||||