Export limit exceeded: 21631 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 207833 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (2776 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2022-3439 | 1 Ikus-soft | 1 Rdiffweb | 2025-05-14 | 9.8 Critical |
| Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling in GitHub repository ikus060/rdiffweb prior to 2.5.0. | ||||
| CVE-2021-33320 | 1 Liferay | 2 Digital Experience Platform, Liferay Portal | 2025-05-13 | 4.3 Medium |
| The Flags module in Liferay Portal 7.3.1 and earlier, and Liferay DXP 7.0 before fix pack 96, 7.1 before fix pack 20, and 7.2 before fix pack 5, does not limit the rate at which content can be flagged as inappropriate, which allows remote authenticated users to spam the site administrator with emails | ||||
| CVE-2019-17359 | 4 Apache, Bouncycastle, Netapp and 1 more | 21 Tomee, Bc-java, Active Iq Unified Manager and 18 more | 2025-05-12 | 7.5 High |
| The ASN.1 parser in Bouncy Castle Crypto (aka BC Java) 1.63 can trigger a large attempted memory allocation, and resultant OutOfMemoryError error, via crafted ASN.1 data. This is fixed in 1.64. | ||||
| CVE-2022-41617 | 1 F5 | 2 Big-ip Advanced Web Application Firewall, Big-ip Application Security Manager | 2025-05-08 | 7.2 High |
| In versions 16.1.x before 16.1.3.1, 15.1.x before 15.1.6.1, 14.1.x before 14.1.5.1, and 13.1.x before 13.1.5.1, When the Advanced WAF / ASM module is provisioned, an authenticated remote code execution vulnerability exists in the BIG-IP iControl REST interface. | ||||
| CVE-2021-26731 | 1 Lannerinc | 2 Iac-ast2500a, Iac-ast2500a Firmware | 2025-05-07 | 9.1 Critical |
| Command injection and multiple stack-based buffer overflows vulnerabilities in the modifyUserb_func function of spx_restservice allow an authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code with the same privileges as the server user (root). This issue affects: Lanner Inc IAC-AST2500A standard firmware version 1.10.0. | ||||
| CVE-2021-26729 | 1 Lannerinc | 2 Iac-ast2500a, Iac-ast2500a Firmware | 2025-05-07 | 10 Critical |
| Command injection and multiple stack-based buffer overflows vulnerabilities in the Login_handler_func function of spx_restservice allow an attacker to execute arbitrary code with the same privileges as the server user (root). This issue affects: Lanner Inc IAC-AST2500A standard firmware version 1.10.0. | ||||
| CVE-2021-26727 | 1 Lannerinc | 2 Iac-ast2500a, Iac-ast2500a Firmware | 2025-05-07 | 10 Critical |
| Multiple command injections and stack-based buffer overflows vulnerabilities in the SubNet_handler_func function of spx_restservice allow an attacker to execute arbitrary code with the same privileges as the server user (root). This issue affects: Lanner Inc IAC-AST2500A standard firmware version 1.10.0. | ||||
| CVE-2022-34439 | 1 Dell | 1 Emc Powerscale Onefs | 2025-05-07 | 5.3 Medium |
| Dell PowerScale OneFS, versions 8.2.0.x-9.4.0.x contain allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling vulnerability. A remote unauthenticated attacker could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to denial of service and performance issue on that node. | ||||
| CVE-2018-20622 | 2 Debian, Jasper Project | 2 Debian Linux, Jasper | 2025-05-06 | 6.5 Medium |
| JasPer 2.0.14 has a memory leak in base/jas_malloc.c in libjasper.a when "--output-format jp2" is used. | ||||
| CVE-2018-2815 | 6 Canonical, Debian, Hp and 3 more | 15 Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux, Xp7 Command View and 12 more | 2025-05-06 | 5.3 Medium |
| Vulnerability in the Java SE, Java SE Embedded, JRockit component of Oracle Java SE (subcomponent: Serialization). Supported versions that are affected are Java SE: 6u181, 7u171, 8u162 and 10; Java SE Embedded: 8u161; JRockit: R28.3.17. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via multiple protocols to compromise Java SE, Java SE Embedded, JRockit. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized ability to cause a partial denial of service (partial DOS) of Java SE, Java SE Embedded, JRockit. Note: Applies to client and server deployment of Java. This vulnerability can be exploited through sandboxed Java Web Start applications and sandboxed Java applets. It can also be exploited by supplying data to APIs in the specified Component without using sandboxed Java Web Start applications or sandboxed Java applets, such as through a web service. CVSS 3.0 Base Score 5.3 (Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L). | ||||
| CVE-2018-2798 | 6 Canonical, Debian, Hp and 3 more | 18 Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux, Xp7 Command View and 15 more | 2025-05-06 | 5.3 Medium |
| Vulnerability in the Java SE, Java SE Embedded, JRockit component of Oracle Java SE (subcomponent: AWT). Supported versions that are affected are Java SE: 6u181, 7u171, 8u162 and 10; Java SE Embedded: 8u161; JRockit: R28.3.17. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via multiple protocols to compromise Java SE, Java SE Embedded, JRockit. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized ability to cause a partial denial of service (partial DOS) of Java SE, Java SE Embedded, JRockit. Note: Applies to client and server deployment of Java. This vulnerability can be exploited through sandboxed Java Web Start applications and sandboxed Java applets. It can also be exploited by supplying data to APIs in the specified Component without using sandboxed Java Web Start applications or sandboxed Java applets, such as through a web service. CVSS 3.0 Base Score 5.3 (Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L). | ||||
| CVE-2018-2796 | 6 Canonical, Debian, Hp and 3 more | 18 Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux, Xp7 Command View and 15 more | 2025-05-06 | 5.3 Medium |
| Vulnerability in the Java SE, Java SE Embedded, JRockit component of Oracle Java SE (subcomponent: Concurrency). Supported versions that are affected are Java SE: 7u171, 8u162 and 10; Java SE Embedded: 8u161; JRockit: R28.3.17. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via multiple protocols to compromise Java SE, Java SE Embedded, JRockit. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized ability to cause a partial denial of service (partial DOS) of Java SE, Java SE Embedded, JRockit. Note: Applies to client and server deployment of Java. This vulnerability can be exploited through sandboxed Java Web Start applications and sandboxed Java applets. It can also be exploited by supplying data to APIs in the specified Component without using sandboxed Java Web Start applications or sandboxed Java applets, such as through a web service. CVSS 3.0 Base Score 5.3 (Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L). | ||||
| CVE-2018-9866 | 1 Sonicwall | 1 Global Management System | 2025-05-05 | 9.8 Critical |
| A vulnerability in lack of validation of user-supplied parameters pass to XML-RPC calls on SonicWall Global Management System (GMS) virtual appliance's, allow remote user to execute arbitrary code. This vulnerability affected GMS version 8.1 and earlier. | ||||
| CVE-2020-10826 | 1 Draytek | 6 Vigor2960, Vigor2960 Firmware, Vigor300b and 3 more | 2025-05-05 | 9.8 Critical |
| /cgi-bin/activate.cgi on Draytek Vigor3900, Vigor2960, and Vigor300B devices before 1.5.1 allows remote attackers to achieve command injection via a remote HTTP request in DEBUG mode. | ||||
| CVE-2019-3821 | 2 Canonical, Ceph | 2 Ubuntu Linux, Civetweb | 2025-05-05 | 7.5 High |
| A flaw was found in the way civetweb frontend was handling requests for ceph RGW server with SSL enabled. An unauthenticated attacker could create multiple connections to ceph RADOS gateway to exhaust file descriptors for ceph-radosgw service resulting in a remote denial of service. | ||||
| CVE-2021-34568 | 1 Wago | 98 750-8100, 750-8100 Firmware, 750-8101 and 95 more | 2025-05-01 | 7.5 High |
| In WAGO I/O-Check Service in multiple products an unauthenticated remote attacker can send a specially crafted packet containing OS commands to provoke a denial of service. | ||||
| CVE-2021-22883 | 6 Fedoraproject, Netapp, Nodejs and 3 more | 12 Fedora, E-series Performance Analyzer, Node.js and 9 more | 2025-04-30 | 7.5 High |
| Node.js before 10.24.0, 12.21.0, 14.16.0, and 15.10.0 is vulnerable to a denial of service attack when too many connection attempts with an 'unknownProtocol' are established. This leads to a leak of file descriptors. If a file descriptor limit is configured on the system, then the server is unable to accept new connections and prevent the process also from opening, e.g. a file. If no file descriptor limit is configured, then this lead to an excessive memory usage and cause the system to run out of memory. | ||||
| CVE-2025-3729 | 1 Senior-walter | 1 Web-based Pharmacy Product Management System | 2025-04-29 | 7.3 High |
| A vulnerability, which was classified as critical, has been found in SourceCodester Web-based Pharmacy Product Management System 1.0. This issue affects some unknown processing of the file backup.php of the component Database Backup Handler. The manipulation of the argument txtdbname leads to os command injection. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. | ||||
| CVE-2020-23584 | 1 Optilinknetwork | 2 Op-xt71000n, Op-xt71000n Firmware | 2025-04-25 | 9.8 Critical |
| Unauthenticated remote code execution in OPTILINK OP-XT71000N, Hardware Version: V2.2 occurs when the attacker passes arbitrary commands with IP-ADDRESS using " | " to execute commands on " /diag_tracert_admin.asp " in the "PingTest" parameter that leads to command execution. | ||||
| CVE-2020-23583 | 1 Optilinknetwork | 2 Op-xt71000n, Op-xt71000n Firmware | 2025-04-25 | 9.8 Critical |
| OPTILINK OP-XT71000N V2.2 is vulnerable to Remote Code Execution. The issue occurs when the attacker sends an arbitrary code on "/diag_ping_admin.asp" to "PingTest" interface that leads to COMMAND EXECUTION. An attacker can successfully trigger the COMMAND and can compromise full system. | ||||