Search
Search Results (7169 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2007-0899 | 2 Clamav, Debian | 2 Clamav, Debian Linux | 2024-11-21 | 9.8 Critical |
| There is a possible heap overflow in libclamav/fsg.c before 0.100.0. | ||||
| CVE-2007-0158 | 1 Acme | 1 Thttpd | 2024-11-21 | 9.8 Critical |
| thttpd 2007 has buffer underflow. | ||||
| CVE-2024-8946 | 1 Micropython | 1 Micropython | 2024-09-24 | 7.3 High |
| A vulnerability was found in MicroPython 1.23.0. It has been classified as critical. Affected is the function mp_vfs_umount of the file extmod/vfs.c of the component VFS Unmount Handler. The manipulation leads to heap-based buffer overflow. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The name of the patch is 29943546343c92334e8518695a11fc0e2ceea68b. It is recommended to apply a patch to fix this issue. In the VFS unmount process, the comparison between the mounted path string and the unmount requested string is based solely on the length of the unmount string, which can lead to a heap buffer overflow read. | ||||
| CVE-2024-8948 | 1 Micropython | 1 Micropython | 2024-09-23 | 7.3 High |
| A vulnerability was found in MicroPython 1.23.0. It has been rated as critical. Affected by this issue is the function mpz_as_bytes of the file py/objint.c. The manipulation leads to heap-based buffer overflow. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The patch is identified as 908ab1ceca15ee6fd0ef82ca4cba770a3ec41894. It is recommended to apply a patch to fix this issue. In micropython objint component, converting zero from int to bytes leads to heap buffer-overflow-write at mpz_as_bytes. | ||||
| CVE-2024-8636 | 1 Google | 1 Chrome | 2024-09-13 | 8.8 High |
| Heap buffer overflow in Skia in Google Chrome prior to 128.0.6613.137 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High) | ||||
| CVE-2021-3408 | 2023-11-07 | 0.0 Low | ||
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none. | ||||
| CVE-2021-31291 | 1 Redhat | 2 Enterprise Linux, Rhel Eus | 2023-11-07 | 8.1 High |
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2021-29457. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2021-29457. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2021-29457 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | ||||
| CVE-2020-26159 | 2023-11-07 | 8.6 High | ||
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none | ||||
| CVE-2016-5320 | 1 Redhat | 1 Enterprise Linux | 2023-11-07 | N/A |
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2016-5314. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2016-5314. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2016-5314 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | ||||