| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| Integer overflow in the VNC display driver in QEMU before 2.1.0 allows attachers to cause a denial of service (process crash) via a CLIENT_CUT_TEXT message, which triggers an infinite loop. |
| A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, was found in InternalError503 Forget It up to 1.3. This affects an unknown part of the file js/settings.js. The manipulation of the argument setForgetTime with the input 0 leads to infinite loop. It is possible to launch the attack on the local host. Upgrading to version 1.4 is able to address this issue. The patch is named adf0c7fd59b9c935b4fd675c556265620124999c. It is recommended to upgrade the affected component. The associated identifier of this vulnerability is VDB-226119. |
| imagemagick 6.8.9.6 has remote DOS via infinite loop |
| Qemu before 2.0 block driver for Hyper-V VHDX Images is vulnerable to infinite loops and other potential issues when calculating BAT entries, due to missing bounds checks for block_size and logical_sector_size variables. These are used to derive other fields like 'sectors_per_block' etc. A user able to alter the Qemu disk image could ise this flaw to crash the Qemu instance resulting in DoS. |
| perl-Convert-ASN1 (aka the Convert::ASN1 module for Perl) through 0.27 allows remote attackers to cause an infinite loop via unexpected input. |
| A Denial of Service (infinite loop) exists in OpenSIPS before 1.10 in lookup.c. |
| A locally locally exploitable DOS vulnerability was found in pax-linux versions 2.6.32.33-test79.patch, 2.6.38-test3.patch, and 2.6.37.4-test14.patch. A bad bounds check in arch_get_unmapped_area_topdown triggered by programs doing an mmap after a MAP_GROWSDOWN mmap will create an infinite loop condition without releasing the VM semaphore eventually leading to a system crash. |
| In xpdf, the xref table contains an infinite loop which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (application crash) in xpdf-based PDF viewers. |
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2012-3548. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2012-3548. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2012-3548 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage |
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2012-6055. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2012-6055. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2012-6055 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. |
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2011-1002. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2011-1002. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2011-1002 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage |
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2012-6062. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2012-6062. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2012-6062 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. |
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2012-6060. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2012-6060. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2012-6060 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. |
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2012-6058. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2012-6058. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2012-6058 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage |
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2012-6054. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2012-6054. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2012-6054 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. |
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2012-6057. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2012-6057. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2012-6057 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. |
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2012-6053. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2012-6053. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2012-6053 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. |
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2012-6061. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2012-6061. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2012-6061 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. |
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2012-6056. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2012-6056. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2012-6056 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. |
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2021-3530. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2021-3530. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2021-3530 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. |
