Export limit exceeded: 204091 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 204091 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (3941 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2024-13707 | 1 Ivanm | 1 Wp Image Uploader | 2026-04-08 | 8.8 High |
| The WP Image Uploader plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.0.1. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the gky_image_uploader_main_function() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to delete arbitrary files via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | ||||
| CVE-2024-13720 | 1 Ivanm | 1 Wp Image Uploader | 2026-04-08 | 8.8 High |
| The WP Image Uploader plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to arbitrary file deletion due to insufficient file path validation in the gky_image_uploader_main_function() function in all versions up to, and including, 1.0.1. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to delete arbitrary files on the server, which can easily lead to remote code execution when the right file is deleted (such as wp-config.php). | ||||
| CVE-2024-13758 | 1 Dwbooster | 1 Cp Contact Form | 2026-04-08 | 6.5 Medium |
| The CP Contact Form with PayPal plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.3.52. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the cp_contact_form_paypal_check_init_actions() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to add discount codes via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | ||||
| CVE-2024-13512 | 1 Wonderjarcreative | 1 Wonder Fontawesome | 2026-04-08 | 6.1 Medium |
| The Wonder FontAwesome plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 0.8. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on one of its functions. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update settings and inject malicious web scripts via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | ||||
| CVE-2019-25447 | 1 Orientdb | 1 Orientdb | 2026-04-07 | 4.3 Medium |
| OrientDB 3.0.17 GA Community Edition contains cross-site request forgery vulnerabilities that allow attackers to perform unauthorized actions by crafting malicious requests to endpoints like /database/, /command/, and /document/. Attackers can create or delete databases, modify schema classes, manage users, and create functions by sending authenticated requests without token validation, combined with reflected and stored cross-site scripting vulnerabilities in the web interface. | ||||
| CVE-2019-25254 | 1 Kyocera | 1 Net Admin | 2026-04-07 | 8.8 High |
| KYOCERA Net Admin 3.4.0906 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows attackers to create administrative users without proper request validation. Attackers can craft malicious web pages that automatically submit forms to add new admin accounts with predefined credentials when a logged-in user visits the page. | ||||
| CVE-2026-33372 | 2 Synacor, Zimbra | 2 Zimbra Collaboration Suite, Collaboration | 2026-04-02 | 5.4 Medium |
| An issue was discovered in Zimbra Collaboration (ZCS) 10.0 and 10.1. A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in Zimbra Webmail due to improper validation of CSRF tokens. The application accepts CSRF tokens supplied within the request body instead of requiring them through the expected request header. An attacker can exploit this issue by tricking an authenticated user into submitting a crafted request. This may allow unauthorized actions to be performed on behalf of the victim. | ||||
| CVE-2026-32755 | 1 Admidio | 1 Admidio | 2026-03-25 | 5.7 Medium |
| Admidio is an open-source user management solution. In versions 5.0.6 and below, the save_membership action in modules/profile/profile_function.php saves changes to a member's role membership start and end dates but does not validate the CSRF token. The handler checks stop_membership and remove_former_membership against the CSRF token but omits save_membership from that check. Because membership UUIDs appear in the HTML source visible to authenticated users, an attacker can embed a crafted POST form on any external page and trick a role leader into submitting it, silently altering membership dates for any member of roles the victim leads. A role leader's session can be silently exploited via CSRF to manipulate any member's membership dates, terminating access by backdating, covertly extending unauthorized access, or revoking role-restricted features, all without confirmation, notification, or administrative approval. This issue has been fixed in version 5.0.7. | ||||
| CVE-2026-32816 | 1 Admidio | 1 Admidio | 2026-03-25 | 5.7 Medium |
| Admidio is an open-source user management solution. In versions 5.0.0 through 5.0.6, the delete, activate, and deactivate modes in modules/groups-roles/groups_roles.php perform destructive state changes on organizational roles but never validate an anti-CSRF token. The client-side UI passes a CSRF token to callUrlHideElement(), which includes it in the POST body, but the server-side handlers ignore $_POST["adm_csrf_token"] entirely for these three modes. An attacker who can discover a role UUID (visible in the public cards view when the module is publicly accessible) can embed a forged POST form on any external page and trick any user with the rol_assign_roles right into deleting or toggling roles for the organization. Role deletion is permanent and cascades to all memberships, event associations, and rights data. If exploited, an attacker can trick any user with delegated role-assignment rights into permanently deleting roles, mass-revoking all associated memberships and access to events, documents, and mailing lists, or silently activating or deactivating entire groups, with target role UUIDs trivially harvested from the unauthenticated public cards view and no undo path short of a database restore. This issue has been fixed in version 5.0.7. | ||||
| CVE-2015-20113 | 2 Next Click Ventuers, Nextclickventures | 2 Realtyscript, Realtyscript | 2026-03-23 | 5.3 Medium |
| Next Click Ventures RealtyScript 4.0.2 contains cross-site request forgery and persistent cross-site scripting vulnerabilities that allow attackers to perform administrative actions and inject malicious scripts. Attackers can craft malicious web pages that execute unauthorized actions when logged-in users visit them, or inject persistent scripts that execute in the application context. | ||||
| CVE-2015-20117 | 2 Next Click Ventures, Nextclickventures | 2 Realtyscript, Realtyscript | 2026-03-23 | 5.3 Medium |
| Next Click Ventures RealtyScript 4.0.2 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows unauthenticated attackers to create unauthorized user accounts and administrative users by crafting malicious forms. Attackers can submit hidden form data to /admin/addusers.php and /admin/editadmins.php endpoints to register new users with arbitrary credentials and escalate privileges to SUPERUSER level. | ||||
| CVE-2016-20034 | 1 Wowza | 1 Streaming Engine | 2026-03-23 | 8.8 High |
| Wowza Streaming Engine 4.5.0 contains a privilege escalation vulnerability that allows authenticated read-only users to elevate privileges to administrator by manipulating POST parameters. Attackers can send POST requests to the user edit endpoint with accessLevel set to 'admin' and advUser parameters set to 'true' and 'on' to gain administrative access. | ||||
| CVE-2016-20035 | 1 Wowza | 1 Streaming Engine | 2026-03-23 | 5.3 Medium |
| Wowza Streaming Engine 4.5.0 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows attackers to perform administrative actions by crafting malicious web pages. Attackers can trick logged-in administrators into visiting a malicious site that submits POST requests to the user edit endpoint to create new admin accounts with arbitrary credentials. | ||||
| CVE-2026-22202 | 2 Gvectors, Wordpress | 2 Wpdiscuz, Wordpress | 2026-03-23 | 8.1 High |
| wpDiscuz before 7.6.47 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows attackers to delete all comments associated with an email address by crafting a malicious GET request with a valid HMAC key. Attackers can embed the deletecomments action URL in image tags or other resources to trigger permanent deletion of comments without user confirmation or POST-based CSRF protection. | ||||
| CVE-2026-22215 | 2 Gvectors, Wordpress | 2 Wpdiscuz, Wordpress | 2026-03-23 | 4.3 Medium |
| wpDiscuz before 7.6.47 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability in the getFollowsPage() function that allows attackers to trigger unauthorized actions without nonce validation. Attackers can craft malicious requests to enumerate follow relationships and manipulate user follow data by exploiting the missing CSRF protection in the follows page handler. | ||||
| CVE-2026-30868 | 1 Opnsense | 2 Core, Opnsense | 2026-03-20 | 6.3 Medium |
| OPNsense is a FreeBSD based firewall and routing platform. Prior to 26.1.4, multiple OPNsense MVC API endpoints perform state‑changing operations but are accessible via HTTP GET requests without CSRF protection. The framework CSRF validation in ApiControllerBase only applies to POST/PUT/DELETE methods, allowing authenticated GET requests to bypass CSRF verification. As a result, a malicious website can trigger privileged backend actions when visited by an authenticated user, causing unintended service reloads and configuration changes through configd. This results in an authenticated Cross‑Site Request Forgery vulnerability allowing unauthorized system state changes. This vulnerability is fixed in 26.1.4. | ||||
| CVE-2026-31954 | 1 Emlog | 1 Emlog | 2026-03-20 | 0 Low |
| Emlog is an open source website building system. In 2.6.6 and earlier, the delete_async action (asynchronous delete) lacks a call to LoginAuth::checkToken(), enabling CSRF attacks. | ||||
| CVE-2018-25186 | 1 Tina4 | 1 Tina4 Stack | 2026-03-16 | 5.3 Medium |
| Tina4 Stack 1.0.3 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows attackers to modify admin user credentials by submitting forged POST requests to the profile endpoint. Attackers can craft HTML forms targeting the /kim/profile endpoint with hidden fields containing malicious user data like passwords and email addresses to update administrator accounts without authentication. | ||||
| CVE-2018-25190 | 2 Rul10, Sourceforge | 2 Easyndexer, Easyndexer | 2026-03-16 | 5.3 Medium |
| Easyndexer 1.0 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows unauthenticated attackers to create administrative accounts by submitting forged POST requests. Attackers can craft malicious web pages that submit POST requests to createuser.php with parameters including username, password, name, surname, and privileges set to 1 for administrator access. | ||||
| CVE-2021-35486 | 1 Nokia | 2 Impact, Impact Mobile | 2026-03-13 | 8.1 High |
| A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Nokia IMPACT through 19.11.2.10-20210118042150283 allows a remote attacker to import and overwrite the entire application configuration. Specifically, in /ui/rest-proxy/entity/import, neither the X-CSRF-NONCE HTTP header nor the CSRF-NONCE cookie is validated. | ||||