Export limit exceeded: 235583 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (235583 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-101031 | 1 Apache | 1 Airflow | 2026-11-12 | 9.1 Critical |
| The `example_dag_decorator` example Dag shipped with Apache Airflow validated an IP address fetched over HTTP with Python's `ipaddress` module and then placed it into a shell command. `ipaddress` accepts IPv6 zone identifiers containing arbitrary characters, so when example Dags are loaded (`load_examples` enabled), a user who can trigger that Dag with a custom `url` parameter could point it at a server whose response injects shell commands run on the worker. This is an incomplete fix for CVE-2025-54941; users who upgraded for CVE-2025-54941 should upgrade again. Users are advised to upgrade to apache-airflow 3.4.0 or later, or to disable example Dags (`load_examples = False`), which is recommended for production. | ||||
| CVE-2026-122475 | 1 Microsoft | 12 Windows 11 23h2, Windows 11 23h2, Windows 11 24h2 and 9 more | 2026-11-12 | 8.8 High |
| Untrusted pointer dereference in Windows Storage Spaces Controller allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network. | ||||
| CVE-2026-118104 | 1 Microsoft | 12 Microsoft Sql Server 2017 (gdr), Microsoft Sql Server 2017 For X64-based Systems \(cu31\), Microsoft Sql Server 2019 (gdr) and 9 more | 2026-11-12 | 6.5 Medium |
| Use of uninitialized resource in SQL Server allows an authorized attacker to disclose information over a network. | ||||
| CVE-2026-118119 | 1 Microsoft | 9 Microsoft Sql Server 2017 For X64-based Systems \(cu31\), Microsoft Sql Server 2019 For X64-based Systems \(cu32\), Microsoft Sql Server 2022 For X64-based Systems \(cu27\) and 6 more | 2026-11-12 | 8 High |
| Improper neutralization of special elements used in an sql command ('sql injection') in SQL Server allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network. | ||||
| CVE-2026-119995 | 1 Microsoft | 5 365 Apps, Microsoft Office Ltsc 2021, Microsoft Office Ltsc 2024 and 2 more | 2026-11-12 | 7.5 High |
| Heap-based buffer overflow in Microsoft Office Outlook allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network. | ||||
| CVE-2026-119997 | 1 Microsoft | 5 365 Apps, Microsoft Office Ltsc 2021, Microsoft Office Ltsc 2024 and 2 more | 2026-11-12 | 7.8 High |
| Heap-based buffer overflow in Microsoft Office Outlook allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code locally. | ||||
| CVE-2026-120976 | 1 Arista | 1 Eos | 2026-11-12 | 6 Medium |
| On affected platforms running Arista EOS with IEEE 802.1X authentication and MACsec using dynamically derived keys, sensitive authentication information may be recorded in diagnostic data during a Smart Switch Upgrade (SSU). An attacker with administrative access on the device who obtains the affected diagnostic data could recover sensitive authentication information. This could potentially compromise the confidentiality and integrity of traffic protected by MACsec on the affected link. The vulnerability is only exposed during and after an SSU reload where an active 802.1X session used for MACsec is present. | ||||
| CVE-2026-120978 | 1 Arista | 1 Eos | 2026-11-12 | 6.5 Medium |
| On affected Arista EOS platforms running Border Gateway Protocol with Link State ( BGP-LS) and configured with the Dynamic Path Selection (DPS) consumer role, an attacker who has established an authenticated BGP-LS session with the device can send a crafted message to cause the BGP agent to restart unexpectedly. An Arista Pathfinder deployment is not required. | ||||
| CVE-2026-121369 | 1 Arista | 1 Eos | 2026-11-12 | 5.3 Medium |
| On affected platforms running Arista EOS under specific link configurations an attacker with direct connectivity to the system may cause system CPU and memory utilization to increase considerably leading to slow responsiveness and eventually may cause the system to reboot. | ||||
| CVE-2026-90436 | 1 Apache | 1 Axis | 2026-11-12 | 9.8 Critical |
| ** UNSUPPORTED WHEN ASSIGNED ** Deserialization of an inbound SOAP fault in Apache Axis 1.x allows unauthenticated remote class instantiation. When a SOAP <Fault> carries a <detail><exceptionName> element, Axis loads the named class and, if a String <data> element is also present, instantiates it through its String constructor before checking that it is an AxisFault. Loading alone runs the class's static initializer. With a suitable class on the application's classpath this leads to remote code execution. The fault is parsed while the engine resolves the target service, before any per-service handler chain runs, so authentication handlers configured on a service do not protect against it. This affects all Apache Axis 1.x versions through 1.4. As Axis 1 has been EOL we recommend you migrate to a different SOAP engine, such as Apache Axis 2/Java. Alternatively you could use a build of Axis with the patch from https://github.com/apache/axis-axis1-java/commit/41f3b4e8d04e310ca81f86b92630ab2c11d608bd applied. The Apache Axis project does not expect to create an Axis 1.x release fixing this problem. | ||||
| CVE-2026-126835 | 2026-11-12 | 6.5 Medium | ||
| The MongoDB Node.js driver does not consistently enforce its permitted-host restriction during OIDC authentication. A bearer token produced by the embedding application's own login callback may therefore be transmitted to a host outside the configured set of permitted hosts, which may result in unintended disclosure of that credential. No database account is required; the party supplying the connection configuration needs only to influence the settings the application passes to the driver. | ||||
| CVE-2026-125847 | 2026-11-12 | 8.8 High | ||
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in webriti vdperanto vdperanto allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects vdperanto: from n/a through 2.2. | ||||
| CVE-2026-125846 | 2026-11-12 | 8.8 High | ||
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in webriti Mazino mazino allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Mazino: from n/a through 1.1. | ||||
| CVE-2026-125844 | 2026-11-12 | 8.8 High | ||
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in webriti vice vice allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects vice: from n/a through 1.4. | ||||
| CVE-2026-125843 | 2026-11-12 | 8.8 High | ||
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in webriti Spasalon spasalon allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Spasalon: from n/a through 3.0. | ||||
| CVE-2026-125841 | 2026-11-12 | 8.8 High | ||
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in webriti Heroic heroic allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Heroic: from n/a through 1.4.2. | ||||
| CVE-2026-125840 | 2026-11-12 | 8.8 High | ||
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in webriti Rambo rambo allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Rambo: from n/a through 3.0. | ||||
| CVE-2026-122102 | 1 Adobe | 1 Adobe Connect | 2026-11-12 | 8.7 High |
| Adobe Connect is affected by a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability that could be abused by a low-privileged attacker to inject malicious scripts into vulnerable form fields. Malicious JavaScript may be executed in a victim's browser when they browse to the page containing the vulnerable field, potentially gaining elevated access or control over the victim's account or session. Scope is changed. | ||||
| CVE-2026-121352 | 1 Adobe | 1 Adobe Connect | 2026-11-12 | 10 Critical |
| Adobe Connect is affected by an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability that could result in privilege escalation. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to gain unauthorized access to sensitive resources. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. Scope is changed. | ||||
| CVE-2026-121908 | 1 Adobe | 1 Adobe Connect | 2026-11-12 | 9.9 Critical |
| Adobe Connect is affected by an Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') vulnerability that could result in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. A low-privileged attacker could exploit this vulnerability to execute arbitrary code. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. Scope is changed. | ||||