| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the Enterprise License Manager (ELM) in Cisco Unified Communications Manager (CM) allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users for requests that make ELM modifications, aka Bug ID CSCui58210. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the ShareThis plugin before 7.0.6 for WordPress allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that modify this plugin's settings. |
| Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in the Sharebar plugin 1.2.5 for WordPress allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that (1) add or (2) modify buttons, or (3) insert cross-site scripting (XSS) sequences. |
| Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in the Noma component in GroundWork Monitor Enterprise 6.7.0 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of unspecified victims for requests that (1) store XSS sequences or (2) delete entries. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the command/user.cgi in Sony SNC CH140, SNC CH180, SNC CH240, SNC CH280, SNC DH140, SNC DH140T, SNC DH180, SNC DH240, SNC DH240T, SNC DH280, and possibly other camera models allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that add users. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in cgi-bin/admin/usrgrp.cgi in AirLive POE2600HD, POE250HD, POE200HD, OD-325HD, OD-2025HD, OD-2060HD, POE100HD, and possibly other camera models allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that add users. |
| Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in the web interface for cumin in Red Hat Enterprise MRG Grid 2.4 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of cumin users for unspecified requests. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the TEQneers SEO Enhancements (tq_seo) extension before 5.0.1 for TYPO3 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of unspecified victims via unknown vectors. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in core/admin/modules/users/create.php in BigTree CMS 4.0 RC2 and earlier allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that create an administrative user via an add user action to index.php. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Siemens WinCC (TIA Portal) 11 and 12 before 12 SP1 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of unspecified victims by leveraging improper configuration of SIMATIC HMI panels by the WinCC product. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in RiteCMS 1.0.0 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that change the administrator password via an edit user action to cms/index.php. |
| Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in Sharetronix 3.1.1 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that (1) change configuration settings or (2) create new administrative users via unspecified vectors. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in IBM InfoSphere Master Data Management - Collaborative Edition 10.x before 10.1 FP8 through 11.0 and InfoSphere Master Data Management Server for Product Information Management 9.0 and 9.1 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the web framework in Cisco Global Site Selector (GSS) allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users, aka Bug ID CSCuh42164. |
| Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in the IndiaNIC Testimonial plugin 2.2 for WordPress allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that (1) add a testimonial via an iNIC_testimonial_save action; (2) add a listing template via an iNIC_testimonial_save_listing_template action; (3) add a widget template via an iNIC_testimonial_save_widget action; insert cross-site scripting (XSS) sequences via the (4) project_name, (5) project_url, (6) client_name, (7) client_city, (8) client_state, (9) description, (10) tags, (11) video_url, or (12) is_featured, (13) title, (14) widget_title, (15) no_of_testimonials, (16) filter_by_country, (17) filter_by_tags, or (18) widget_template parameter to wp-admin/admin-ajax.php. |
| inc/central.class.php in GLPI before 0.84.2 does not attempt to make install/install.php unavailable after an installation is completed, which allows remote attackers to conduct cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attacks, and (1) perform a SQL injection via an Etape_4 action or (2) execute arbitrary PHP code via an update_1 action. |
| Coursemill Learning Management System (LMS) 6.8 constructs secret tokens based on time values, which makes it easier for remote attackers to conduct cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attacks via vectors related to cookies, a different vulnerability than CVE-2013-3605. |
| Tweetbot 1.3.3 for Mac, and 2.8.5 for iPad and iPhone, does not require confirmation of (1) follow or (2) favorite actions, which allows remote attackers to automatically force the user to perform undesired actions, as demonstrated via the tweetbot:///follow/ URL. |
| Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in D-Link DSL-2740B Gateway with firmware EU_1.00 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that (1) enable or disable Wireless MAC Address Filters via a wlFltMode action to wlmacflt.cmd, (2) enable or disable firewall protections via a request to scdmz.cmd, or (3) enable or disable remote management via a save action to scsrvcntr.cmd. |
| Google Chrome before 29 sends HTTP Cookie headers without first validating that they have the required character-set restrictions, which allows remote attackers to conduct the equivalent of a persistent Logout CSRF attack via a crafted parameter that forces a web application to set a malformed cookie within an HTTP response. |